How Is a Capitalist System Different Than a Free Market System?

Is the free market the same as capitalism?

A capitalist economy and a Free market economy are two types of economic systems. Often the terms are used interchangeably, especially in common parlance. But, although they have overlapping qualities, the two are not quite the same thing.

The capitalist and liberal systems emanate from the same economic soil, so to speak: the law of supply and demandwhich becomes the basis for determining the price and production of goods and services.

But they refer to different things. Capitalism is focused on wealth creation and ownership of capital and production factorswhereas a free market system is focused on the exchange of wealth or goods and services.

Key points to remember

  • The free market and capitalism are not identical economic systems, although they often go hand in hand.
  • Capitalism refers to the creation of wealth and ownership of capital, production and distribution, whereas a free market system refers to the exchange of wealth or goods and services.
  • Key features of capitalism include personal ownership of property, open competition, and individual incentives.
  • A free market system is entirely governed by demand and supply from buyers and sellers, with little or no government regulation.
  • Many capitalist countries, including the United States, have in effect mixed economies: while free-market elements prevail, considerable state supervision, taxation, and regulation exist, particularly in particular sectors.

Key Differences Between Capitalism and Free Market

Some key characteristics of capitalism include competition between businesses and owners, private ownership, and the motivation to generate a profit. In a capitalist society, the production and pricing of goods and services is largely determined by supply and demand – the free market – but some government regulation and oversight may occur. And the profits of capitalist enterprises can be tax strongly.

Moreover, the market may be free only in name: a private owner in a capitalist system may have a monopoly in a particular field or geographical area, preventing effective competition.

In contrast, a free market system is entirely governed by demand and supply, and there is little or no government regulations. In a free market system, a buyer and a seller transact freely and only when they voluntarily agree on the price of a good or service.

For example, suppose a seller wants to sell a toy for $5 and a buyer wants to buy that toy for $3. A transaction will take place when the buyer and seller agree on a price. Because a free market system is based solely on supply and demand, it leads to free competition in the economy, without any interference from outside forces.

  • Capitalism is a system of economic production: things are produced by workers who are hired by business owners (capitalists) in exchange for wages.
  • Markets are economic distribution systems: who gets what and how much?

Free market examples

Free markets are all around us, relatively speaking. Each country has Free market aspects, although there is no totally pure free market; it is more a concept than a tangible reality. Most countries have a mixed economy or mixed economic system.

For example, the United States is often seen as a highly capitalist country, with its economy embodying the essence of a free market. However, sources evaluating the economy often do not consider it 100% pure, as there are federal minimum wages and antitrust laws; regulations imposed by government agencies such as the SEC; and corporate taxes, as well as import and export duties.

For example, the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation’s 2022 Index of Economic Freedom, which ranks nations on a 100-point scale, gives the United States a score of 72.1, putting it in the second-best category. “mainly free” level (the United States ranks 25th overall).

The United States fares slightly better in the “Economic Freedom of the World: 2021 Annual Report,” published by the Fraser Institute of Canada, another think tank. With a score of 8.24 out of a possible 10, it comes in at sixth place in the world rankings, squarely in the highest “freest” category (Hong Kong ranks number one on the global list).

At the other end of the spectrum, there are countries that are considered “repressed” (as the Heritage Foundation puts it). These countries have virtually no economic freedom. The most repressed, according to the 2022 ranking, is North Korea (ranked 177th), with Venezuela (176th) and Cuba (175th) also at the bottom of the list.

In the Fraser Institute report, Venezuela ranks as the “least free” – at 165th, down the list. Other low scorers include Algeria (162nd), Libya (163rd) and Sudan (164th).

Georgia, the small country that used to be part of the Soviet Union, has made great strides over the years to become more of a free market. Focusing on flat tax rates and privatization, the country ranks 26th in economic freedoms with an overall freedom score of 71.8. His score in 1998 was 47.9 and 69.2 in 2008.

Free Market Economy #1

For years, Hong Kong has often been cited as the country closest to a fully free market economy. It was ranked no. 1 or not. 2, at the top of the “free” category (the highest level), for more than two decades on the Heritage Foundation’s list. It still tops the Fraser Economic Freedom of the World Index.

However, one could argue that Hong Kong, under Chinese control since the mid-1990s, is not truly an independent nation, especially given the Chinese government’s increasing interventions in its economy in 2019-20. For this reason, it is not on the Heritage Foundation 2021 list at all.

Instead, the top heritage spot goes to Singapore; with a score of 84.4, he was ranked the freest in the world for the third consecutive year. Singapore occupies the no. 2 place on the Fraser index.

While no country is 100% unregulated, Singapore comes as close as it gets. The government is very business-friendly and open to global investment; the legislation is lax and the corporate tax rate is 17%.

People there live long and see their salaries constantly rising – they have a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita among the highest in the world, helping to spread economic freedoms. Singapore also enjoys privileged access to global trade and property rights.

The opposite of a free market economy is a planned, controlled or command economy. The government controls the means of production and the distribution of wealth, dictating the prices of goods and services and the wages workers receive.

What does free market capitalism mean?

Any economy is capitalist as long as individuals control the factors of production. A purely capitalist economy is also a free market economy, meaning that the law of supply and demand, rather than a central government, regulates production, labor and the market. Companies sell goods and services at the highest price that consumers are willing to pay, while workers earn the highest wages that companies are willing to pay for their services. The pursuit of profit drives all commerce and forces businesses to operate as efficiently as possible to avoid losing market share to competitors.

Can you have a free market without capitalism?

Yes, a free market can exist without capitalism. It can exist under socialism, as long as there are no coercive (forced) transactions or conditions on transactions, or in other types of communal/mutual societies, such as those possessed by Native American tribes.

That said, most free markets tend to coincide with countries and societies that value private property and capitalism and eschew state ownership and regulation. Free markets are more likely to develop and prosper in a system where property rights are well protected and where individuals are encouraged to invest, acquire, build and seek profit.

What is an example of a capitalist economy?

New Zealand is an excellent example of a capitalist economy. This wealthy Asia-Pacific country has systematically deregulated and privatized many industrial and professional sectors since the 1980s. Its judicial system recognizes and enforces private property interests and contracts. Government subsidies are low and an open and liberal attitude towards global trade and investment is well established. Tariffs are low on imports and exports, which account for around 50% of New Zealand’s GDP.

Is the United States a free market?

Yes, the United States is largely, but not completely, a free market. Although it is primarily capitalistic – that is, private ownership of property and production predominates – and the laws of supply and demand largely govern the economy, it has certain elements socialists: the government plays a role in economic affairs and financial policies.

The United States, strictly speaking, is considered to have a mixed economy: Some aspects of it are free and unfettered, while others are state-controlled or highly regulated.

Is Free Market Capitalism Good?

Whether free-market capitalism is good or bad has long been a source of debate, dating back to the mid-1800s when capitalism began to flourish in developed countries, as well as criticisms of it from the from supporters of alternative systems, such as communism.

Proponents of market capitalism argue that private ownership and the open, unregulated exchange of goods and services is the fairest and most efficient path to economic growth and progress. Nothing can replace the motivating power of personal incentives, individual freedom and open competition, they say.

Critics counter that free-market capitalism promotes inequality, concentrating and keeping power in the hands of a few, who then exploit the majority. It prioritizes individual profit above the welfare of society, dividing people into “haves” and “have-nots”.

Proponents note that many of the world’s most prosperous and advanced countries practice free-market capitalism, making it a model for developing nations. But skeptics note that these systems are not always pure – they also possess strong socialist characteristics and elements of controlled economies.

For example, one could argue that the United States – widely seen as one of the avatars of a free-market capitalist system – only reached its 20th century heights of power and prosperity after the expansion of government controls, social programs and monitoring/response agencies. via the New Deal of the 1930s and the Great Society of the 1960s.

Disclaimer: Curated and re-published here. We do not claim anything as we translated and re-published using Google translator. All ideas and images shared only for information purpose only. Ideas and information collected through Google re-written in accordance with guidelines and published. We strictly follow Google Webmaster guidelines. You can reach us @ We resolve the issues within hour to keep the work on top priority.

Related Posts